The idea of the natural sublime was a symbolic standard
for panorama reviewers, a way of evoking the awe-inspiring properties
of panoramas representing natural scenes in ways familiar to even middle
class audiences in the nineteenth-century. The panoramas realistic design
thus “transported” spectators in two senses: to the location
represented in the painting and to a level of metaphysical contemplation.
In the case of wraparound panoramas the sensation of sublimity may have
derived as much from the illusionism of the panorama “effect”
as from the specific content of the painting.
| |
Albert Smith’s
“Ascent of Mont Blanc” panorama was
shown at the Egyptian Hall, Picadilly.
The panorama formed the background to a Swiss chalet before which
Smith had placed a pool with fish and alpine plants. Critics did
not approve when three dimensional props were added; more ordinary
subjects could be embellished, but not locations associated with
evocations of the sublime such as alpine scenes.
[Click here for larger
image] |
Battles were the subject of panoramas during the nineteenth-century
panorama “craze,” and the idea of the sublime within this
genre became an expression of nationalistic fervor. The viewer experienced
the humbling effect of being transported to the battlefield not as a
mere voyeur but as a witness to history.
|
|
British
Battle by Sir Robert Ker Porter
The panoramas of Sir Robert Ker Porter was primarily responsible
for developing the battle panorama in England. British victories
became the subject of “instant” panoramas, which in
their day were the static equivalent of todays’s CNN.
[Click
here for larger image]
|
|
Broadside
for the Burning of the Houses of Parliament
Panorama painters responded to major news, such as the 1834 burning
of Houses of Parliament, which was painted in panorama form by
Charles Marshall within one week. The panorama functioned as a
kind of illustrated newspaper of current events.
[Click here
for larger image] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the early Imax film To Fly—produced as part
of the 1976 Smithsonian Bicentenary celebrations—issues of national
identity are bound tightly to technological developments in aviation
through meta-narratives of American progress and domination in flight
technology. While panoramas did circulate across national borders in
the nineteenth century, their national specificity played a role in
determining their success in foreign markets. For example, it was precisely
the overtly nationalistic content of many European 360 degree panoramas
which limited their appeal within the U.S. panorama market, where Americans
were more interested in their own geography and western frontier than
in ancient ruins and European battles.
| |
Broadside for
Panorama to be exhibited North 11th, near Market St. The painting
of the celebrated Palace and garden of Versailles, [Philadelphia]
July 1821. Library of Congress American Memory Collection.
[Click
here for larger image] |
|
Arrowsmith’s Panorama
of Western Travel [Harper’s New Monthly Magazine],
Vol. 18, Issue 103, December 1858. Library of Congress American
Memory Collection.
[Click
here for larger image] |
|
Broadside for “Original
panorama of the gold regions of California!” painted
by S.A. Hudson, Esq. Library of Congress American Memory Collection.
[Click
here for larger image] |